South Africa’s political tensions escalated on Thursday after the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) demanded the immediate arrest of businessman and forensic investigator Paul O’Sullivan, accusing him of being in contempt of Parliament.
The dramatic call follows O’Sullivan’s appearance before an Ad Hoc Committee probing explosive allegations made by Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi regarding alleged capture of law enforcement institutions. The committee was set up to investigate claims that key arms of the state, including elements within the South African Police Service (SAPS), may have been compromised.
According to the EFF, O’Sullivan walked out of the parliamentary session while under cross-examination, prompting the party to label his conduct as a deliberate attempt to evade accountability.
What Happened in Parliament?
In a statement issued on 26 February 2026, the EFF said O’Sullivan had initially tried to avoid appearing before the committee, citing threats to his life. However, after pressure from MPs and the public, he eventually attended and made several serious allegations against SAPS officials, Crime Intelligence, and Members of Parliament.
The party claims that while O’Sullivan was allowed to level accusations freely, he “ran from interrogation like a criminal with something to hide” when questioned about his qualifications and appointments to key institutions.
The EFF argues that by leaving during proceedings, O’Sullivan undermined Parliament’s authority and should face immediate legal consequences.
EFF’s Demands
The party has called on law enforcement authorities to act swiftly.
In its statement seen by ZiGoats.com, the EFF said:
“Paul O’Sullivan has effectively undermined the authority of Parliament, and is currently in contempt of Parliament.”
The party further urged police at major airports, including OR Tambo and Cape Town International, to apprehend him should he attempt to leave the country.
It also called on Airports Company South Africa (ACSA) to block any private aircraft that could facilitate his departure.
What This Means Politically
This latest development adds fuel to an already volatile political climate. The Ad Hoc Committee was established to strengthen oversight and restore public confidence in state institutions. A high-profile witness walking out mid-session risks deepening mistrust and intensifying political divisions.
For Parliament, the issue now shifts to whether formal contempt proceedings will follow. For law enforcement, the question is whether the EFF’s demands carry legal weight under parliamentary rules and South African law.
As of publication, O’Sullivan had not publicly responded to the EFF’s latest statement.
The situation remains fluid, with further updates expected as Parliament and law enforcement authorities consider their next steps.
Leave a Reply