A high-profile marital dispute involving Zimbabwean businessman Wicknell Chivayo and his former partner Sonja Madzikanda has spilled into the public domain, raising complex legal and cultural questions around marriage, divorce, and property rights.
Chivayo claims Madzikanda is demanding at least US$25 million, luxury upkeep, and even a private jet as part of a divorce settlement. The businessman, however, has dismissed the claims as unrealistic, arguing that their relationship was an unregistered customary law union, which under Zimbabwean law does not automatically entitle a partner to such extensive financial claims. In a lengthy statement, Chivayo said:
“Now she is claiming USD1 Million for holidays and US$25 Million for her ‘up keep and maintenance’… She’s also claiming my private jet… which I bought more than 7 months after we had ‘divorced’.”
He added that the matter is currently before the courts and therefore sub judice.
At the heart of the dispute is a key legal question: what rights arise from customary unions that are not formally registered? In Zimbabwe, such unions are recognised culturally but often present challenges in court, especially when it comes to property sharing, maintenance, and asset ownership after separation.
Chivayo maintains that the only legal considerations should revolve around child custody and co-parenting, not asset distribution. He also detailed what he described as a difficult relationship, alleging emotional and physical abuse during their time together, claims that remain one-sided and untested in court.
Culturally, the case has also reignited debate around expectations placed on wealthy men. Chivayo himself acknowledged the perception, saying, “wealthy and successful businessmen are polygamous by nature,” but firmly rejected any suggestion of rekindling the relationship or entering a polygamous arrangement.
The dispute comes after Chivayo has since remarried, further complicating the dynamics. Meanwhile, Madzikanda maintains that the marriage has not been formally dissolved, a position that could influence court proceedings.
As the case unfolds, it is set to test the intersection of customary law, modern legal frameworks, and evolving social expectations in Zimbabwe, particularly around wealth, marriage, and women’s rights in separation disputes.
Leave a Reply